We build plant care tools that reduce guesswork and give plant owners a reliable, evidence-based foundation for decisions that affect living things.
Most plant care advice online is either too vague to act on or too species-specific to generalise. A plant owner with a monstera in a north-facing London flat and another with the same species in a sunny Madrid window need different information. LeafCycle was built to bridge that gap.
Our tools take real environmental variables as inputs and return outputs grounded in published horticultural data. We do not publish generic "water once a week" guidance. We provide calculations, diagnostic logic, and articles written by practitioners with domain expertise.
Every recommendation in our tools traces back to peer-reviewed horticultural research or established agronomic practice. No folklore, no anecdote.
A useful tool accounts for your specific conditions. We ask the questions that matter — pot size, soil type, humidity — because they change the answer.
All tools on LeafCycle are free to use without registration. Plant health knowledge should not require a subscription.
We document our calculation logic openly. You should understand why the tool gives the result it does, not just accept it.
Emily designs the care algorithms and validates tool outputs against botanical reference data. She has worked in plant consultancy for eleven years.
Daniel leads research on light and transpiration modelling. His academic background in photomorphogenesis informs the light-adjustment calculations.
Claire advises on growing media formulation. She ensures the soil-type inputs in LeafCycle tools reflect real-world substrate behaviour.